Topic · Updated June 19, 2026
Dify Agent Workflows
Short answer
Dify Agent Workflows is a focused Workflow Trust topic for builders evaluating dify app templates. Start by inspecting source-visible repositories, reviewed workflow files, compatible agents, license signals, and maintenance evidence before running anything locally. The practical goal is not to certify a repository as safe, but to help readers decide whether it belongs in a reviewed workflow, pending review candidate, or hidden low-confidence bucket. For this topic, the main review concern is that hosted workflows can mix customer data and model prompts.
Dify workflows often combine prompt chains, RAG sources, model settings, and hosted execution. A useful review explains source files, import path, data inputs, and where human approval belongs.
Who this topic helps
- Builders evaluating Dify app templates.
- Editors reviewing research or support workflows.
- Teams checking hosted agent boundaries.
Start here
Use this page as a focused path into Workflow Trust. It groups source-visible workflow reviews, practical guides, and risk notes around one search intent instead of forcing readers through the full catalog first.
Related workflow reviews
Related guides
Risk notes
- Hosted workflows can mix customer data and model prompts.
- RAG sources can contain prompt injection.
- Publishing or messaging outputs should require human approval.
Related questions
- What are dify agent workflows?
- Which GitHub repositories are useful for dify agent workflows?
- What risks should be checked before using dify agent workflows?
Common search phrases
dify agent workflows, dify agent workflows GitHub source, dify agent workflows risk review, dify agent workflows compatible agents
FAQ
What should be reviewed in a Dify workflow?
Review DSL files, prompt chains, retrieval sources, credentials, model settings, and output destinations.
Are Dify workflows local?
Usually no. Treat hosted execution and data routing as part of the risk review.